A few years ago, I read The
New New Thing by Michael Lewis, describing how the technologists and
venture capitalists worked together (or possible at each others’ throats) to
create that economy outburst known as dot-com.
Now, more than a decade later, the dot-com bubble has burst and the
economy is stagnant. So what did it all
mean?
First, the technological capabilities remain, and should be
a basis for further growth and jobs.
Secondly, many fortunes were made during the dot-com period. Have those fortunes been reinvested in the
next new, new thing—or slumbering in wealthy persons’ art vaults or in overseas
banks? Too much of the latter, I fear.
There are still new, new things there could be opportunities
for investment that would advance the country’s economy and be a major
job-creator. Some examples:
Drone package
delivery. Amazon has proposed a
drone package delivery system in which small packages could be delivered to
customers by drone in a few hours or less.
Why, we might ask.
Who is not patient enough to wait a few days for his or her new
merchandise? There probably are
some. But, maybe, the use is far
broader, extending to such things as manufacturing, medical facilities or car
repair. A few years ago when the
Japanese were kicking our butts in manufacturing capability, they developed a
concept known as just in time (JIT) for delivery of parts to the production
line. It eliminated large supply warehouses
and double handling of material. Might
be one possibility.
Robotic automobiles. Google has developed and demonstrated cars
that are able to start, maneuver through traffic and park far more efficiently
than most drivers do. Given Americans’ love
for the automobile and the feeling of being the “king of the road”, who would
want such a vehicle? But Google
knows. Reducing long-trip fatigue,
enabling physically challenged persons to drive, etc are some possibilities
plus more we don’t even recognize.
3-D printers. This technology has been around for over
a decade but is still developmental in the kinds of material, especially
metals, that can be printed. The
possibilities range from artistic creation to small quantity fabrication to
low-cost prototyping of production items.
If outsourced manufacturing comes back to the U.S. ,
and I’m convinced it will, 3-D printing will be valuable.
Smart glasses. Here is a natural extension of the smart
phone. Now, as demonstrated in the 2014
Consumer Electronic Show, a visual capability has been added. The glasses have a tiny viewable screen near
the eye and a camera capability for still photos and video recording as well as
computing and internet. A perfect step
up from smart phones for the gadget-oriented.
But maybe much more. A doctor
recently performed surgery with one of these devices making it possible to view
the patient’s x-rays without looking away from the operation. Its potential value in police and fire
protection is huge.
What do these devices have in common? I think it is that their ultimate uses are
not envisioned—not envisioned any more than the personal computer’s
applications were when first introduced.
In the early days of the personal computer and the internet,
the entrepreneurs and technogeeks found how to reduce costs to make their stuff
affordable for a wide market. Venture
capital sources flooded the promising entrepreneurs with money to make this
happen. Today, the technical geniuses
are creating, but where are the venture capitalists?
No comments:
Post a Comment